Women in Civil War - 1004 Words

Women, Slaves, and Free Blacks in the Civil War What roles did the Northern women play in the war effort on the Union side during the Civil War? What roles did the Southern women play in the war effort on the Confederate side during the Civil War? How did the war affect each group? â€Å"There were just shy of 400 documented cases of women who served as soldiers during the Civil War, according to the records of the Sanitary Commission.† (Brown, 2012) Women during the 19th century, according to Historian Barbara Welters were â€Å"hostage of the home†. (Brown, 2012) Women were considered what we know now as home wives, without really the option of doing anything outside of the home. When the Civil War began, that meant that men left home†¦show more content†¦There were others that were about of the regiments in which the male relative was serving. These women â€Å"camp followers† tended to the sick, cleaned weapons, cooked, and help take care of the sick. (Middle Tennessee State University Teaching with Primary Sources, 2015) In my own opinion I believe the war had a great effect on the women of both the North and the South. Without them, I don’t believe there would have been enough nurses to have saved the men they did and there wouldn’t have been anything â€Å"at home† for all left on the home-front. Because of the war, we have great American History about women and the impact t hey had on the Civil War and after. Which I believe led to a huge part of the Women’s Rights Movement. What roles did the Black slaves play in the Civil War? What roles did the free Blacks play in the Civil War? How did the war affect each group? â€Å"It took a clear and dire urging from the beloved General Robert E. Lee to convince the Confederate Congress to begin enlisting black soldiers.† (Civil War Trust, 2015) Black men had tried to volunteer their services to the Union but because of President Lincoln being afraid of what it would do to the white men’s morale, he rejected the blacks from volunteering for the war. However, in saying that, it did changed. President Lincoln passed the Emancipation Proclamation, which stated â€Å"All persons held as slaves within any States†¦in rebellion against the United States, shallShow MoreRelatedWomen In The Civil War1674 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿ Women Who Fought In the Civil War Submitted By: Tierahnee Balfour History 2010 Enhanced Mrs. Teresa Prober 19 October 2012 It is an accepted convention that the Civil War was a man’s fight, but to the women in that time period, it was not. Many women sacrificed their lives to fight for their family and for their country. The Civil War is symbolic in American history because it shaped society, as we know it today, â€Å"Free of slavery†. During the Civil War, women were mostlyRead MoreWomen Of The Civil War885 Words   |  4 Pages For women in the 1860s it was predictable wisdom that a â€Å"woman’s place is in the home,† but the Civil War challenged this view (Civil War Academy, 2015). There were many women who played an important role in the Civil War. It is normal to think the Civil War was a man’s fight. However during the war, many women challenged the role of the women and took on different roles. While the men marched off to war, the women had to work hard and try to provide for their families. Women became doctors, spiesRead MoreWomen Of The Civil War1553 Words   |  7 PagesWomen of the Civil War The Civil War is a very important part of American history – simply put, it determined what kind of nation the United States would be. The Civil War resolved whether the United States is what determined the survival of the Union or whether the Confederacy would gain independence. It is the battle that determined whether the largest slaveholding country in the world would continue to exist as such since it thrived on the fundamental idea that â€Å"all men are created with an equalRead MoreWomen Of The Civil War1720 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Civil War, it was erected to make sure the men would not have died in vain, and after reading it I could not help but to ask myself, â€Å"Are we to let the women?† Kids will learn of the Civil War starting in elementary school, and will continue to do so as far as their education leads them. They will learn of the brave men who fought for their beliefs and rights, brother who fought against brother, and the men who led these soldi ers into battle. There is, however, one side of the Civil War whichRead MoreWomen Of The Civil War1329 Words   |  6 PagesWhen we think of the Civil War, many think of the sacrifices and influences of the men during this time. Women of the Civil War however, were also active participants of making history. Their lives before the war were that of being proper. Their focus was working to maintain and support their families. The Civil War stole away the life as women knew it and placed them into a whole different role- one that was much more difficult both physically and emotionally. Women of both the North and theRead MoreWomen Of The Civil War1739 Words   |  7 PagesWomen without a doubt have dealt with a large portion of the inequality that rules this nation. But the military has always been accepting of others. This is a way for women to make great livable wages and maintain a steady occupation. Women being in the military dates all the way back to the civil war. During the times of the civil war many women pretended to be men so they could join and fight for a variety of different reasons. Some went to war to be with their loved ones, they had this thrillRead MoreWomen During The Civil War1049 Words   |  5 PagesFor Civil War women in the 1860s it was predictable wisdom that a â€Å"woman’s place is in the home,† but the Civil War challenged this view. There were many women who played an important role in the Civil War. It is normal to think the Civil War was a man’s fight. However during the war, many women challenged the role of the women and took on different roles. While the men marched off to war, the women had to work hard and try to provide for their families. Women became doctors, spies, nurses, couriersRead MoreWomen During The Civil War1523 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Civil War, some of the more notable names were: Ulysses S. Grant, Thomas â€Å"Stonewall† Jackson, and George Custer. These names are synonymou s with great generals who fought great battles during the war, but what about Sarah Emma Edmonds, Clara Burton, Dorthea Dix, Rose O’Neal Greenhow, and Loreta Janeta Velazquez? These names are not as known as their male counterparts, but these ladies of the Civil War Era did their part to aide their respective sides in the war. What these and other women didRead MoreWomen During The Civil War1388 Words   |  6 PagesThe Civil War altered the lives of women, in both the North and South, just as it altered the nation as a whole. Although it is irrefutable that both the North and the South felt the wrath of the war, the South encountered a unique set of troubles that caused the weight of the war to fall predominantly on Southern women. Attempting to understand the experiences of all Southern women during the Civil War does not come without its challenges. It is impossible to connect the stories and experiencesRead MoreWomen Of The American Civil War1499 Words   |  6 Page swonderful history of the â€Å"Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War†. This informative study allows the reader to get a look into the life of privileged white women of the south. Faust uses diaries, political documents, newspapers and personal letters, to give the reader to experience things through the eyes and in the words of the women themselves. Faust presents a number of southern women whose lives were changed by the societal upheavals caused by the civil war. The book, proficiently

Theories of Pyramid creation Free Essays

The Egyptian pyramid construction theories range from simply outlandish to impossible. Almost all Archaeologist and some engineers take a stab at a theory sometime during their career. None have been proven and all are simply an educated guess. We will write a custom essay sample on Theories of Pyramid creation or any similar topic only for you Order Now No one knows how the pyramids could have been built without today’s heavy machinery. It seems Impossible for any group of men to move a 2. 5 ton block from the quarry to the construction site and then manage to lift Into the alarm to stack It precisely on top of each other without machinery and surveying tools. Doesn’t It? In order to understand the size and magnitude of these pyramids, for example, the great pyramid of Gaza. This pyramid stood over oft tall and was the largest recorded structure in the world for over 3,800 years. It was made from roughly 2 be a mystery without modern day tools. Whoever built the pyramids employed a technology that far surpasses modern technology In most cases. Some say that present day engineers and architects are at such a complete loss as to how they were built and most admit they remain one of the most complex, sophisticated and receives built structures on earth. Some say that a select group of architects and engineers are at such a loss that they have turned to alien technology as the only possible answer. Theory; aliens built the pyramids, not man. People that believe this theory often base it on the fact that Egyptians had no knowledge of math or geometry and the fact that the pyramids align precisely with the constellation Orient’s Belt. â€Å"Gaza consists of two almost equally tall pyramids and a smaller one which is only 53% of the height of the other two. The belt of Orion consists of two almost animally bright stars, and one with only 50% of the brightness of the other two. The smallest pyramid is the one which deviates from the diagonal, as does the dimmest star. † (Mohammad, 2013) It is also impossible to explain how the pyramid of Gaza is aligned perfectly with the magnetic north pole since they had no use of a compass, especially since it had not even been vented yet. How can anyone explain how they moved such massive blocks of stone without the wheel, it also had not been vented yet. These all are interesting facts that say something out of this world helped the Egyptians build the pyramids, but the most astonishing one was when a reputable Egyptian Archeologist, Dry Ala Shaken told an audience that there might be some truth to the theory that aliens were involved in the construction of the great pyramids of Gaza. In a statement during an interview Dry. Shaken replied to a question from Mr.. Mark Novak that implied that there may be OF technology within Its structure with the following statement â€Å"l cannot confirm or deny this, but there Is something Inside the pyramid that Is â€Å"not of this world. † Dry. Shaken has failed to elaborate on is comment which leaves all of guessing. Michael Cohen, 2010) There are two theories close In similarity that most modern scholars believe to be possible, the external ramp theory and the Internal ramp theory. The first theory, the external ramp theory, Is based on the men pulling the large stone up a ramp that would Increase In height as the pyramid did. â€Å"Historians speculate that the stones were dragged up inclined ramps made of compacted rubble bonded and made slippery theory is it is believed to be impossible for the men to pull the stones up a ramp rater than 8% grade, this would mean the ramp would have to be over a mile long. There is not room, and there is not such a ramp on the Gaza plateau. Because the single straight ramp theory Just doesn’t work many have opted for an optional ramp theory. The internal ramp theory combines both theories. It is believed that the bottom third of the pyramid had a single straight ramp that the blocks were dragged up. The internal ramp theory is based on the fact that the incline would never exceed 7%. This would be accomplished by building a ramp that wrapped the inside of the Truckee, similar to a spiral staircase. By using this method the blocks were pulled up the bottom 1/3 straight external ramp, they were then pulled inside and pulled up an internal ramp. It is believed that the reason there is not an external ramp in existence today is because it was categorized by using its blocks to create the top the 2/3 of the structure. This theory seems to be the best possible solution on how the pyramids were built, but it still doesn’t explain how it was done with such precision and accuracy, which many believe will always remain a mystery. How to cite Theories of Pyramid creation, Papers

Psychologist Theories free essay sample

Even though nature and nurture influence human behavior, nature and nurture work together equally in the development of human behavior because both genetics and environmental influences affect the outcome of a persons behavior and/or personality, while neither of the two traits can single-handedly determine ones behavior and/or personality. The question that has been pondered upon for many decades is which of the two (nature or nurture) are more influential? To illustrate: In looking for the causes of individual differences in intelligence, a major issue is the relative contribution of genetics and environment. 100% Genetics(Nature)90% Gen. 80% Gen. 70% Gen. 60% Gen. 50-5060% Env. 70% Env. 80% Env. 90% Env. 100% Environ. (Nurture) Rate the extent to which you believe nature and nature influence (cause) human intelligence. (Ridley, 1999) There is a question as to how nature and nurture influence behavior. All throughout history psychologists have been trying to figure out which of the two, nature or nurture, influence the development of human behavior and/or personality more and because of this particular question psychologists began to do intensive research. They did this by studying each of the two theories separately. One psychologist, Plato, campaigned nature while the other, Aristotle, campaigned nurture. The studies began with nature. Nature is defined as the heredity or biological make-up that influences the outcome of ones behavior and/or personality. Nature can also be defined as an individuals innate qualities. Some psychologists, like Plato, suggest that humans start out in life with some amount of knowledge. Nature provides us with abilities and traits like eye and hair color, skin color, and intelligence that is determined by certain genes that are embedded in each cell in the human body. Again, many psychologists, like Plato, believe that genetics ultimately take credit for the resulting human behavior. On the other hand nurture is Nature v. Nurture 3 defined as the environmental factors that influence the outcome of ones behavior and/or personality. Nurture can also be defined as ones personal experiences. Some psychologists, such as Aristotle, suggest that humans start out in life without any knowledge, but knowledge is gained through life experiences. These psychologists believe how a child or person is raised strongly influences human behavior. Many psychologists, like Aristotle, believe that human behavior and/or personality is a product of the environment. While each child is born with his or her own distinct genetic potential for physical, social, emotional and cognitive development, the possibilities for reaching that potential remain tied to early life experiences and the parent-child relationship within the family. (Weissbourd, Bernice; Grimm, Carol). To illustrate so statistics have been provided thanks to a researcher named Ridley (1999): â€Å"Concordance rates of IQ scores  ·Evidence from family studies provides the main supporting evidence from which arguments about the relative roles of genetics and environment are constructed. A large number of the study of twins rea red apart was undertaken by Thomas Bouchard of the University of Minnesota starting in 1979. He â€Å"collected† pairs of separated twins from all over the world and reunited them while testing their personalities and IQs. Other studies at he same time concentrated on comparing the IQs of adopted people with those of their adopted parents and their biological parents or their siblings. Put all these studies together, which include the IQ tests of tens of thousands of individuals, and the table looks like this: Same person tested twice 87%  ·Identical twins reared together 86%  ·Identical twins reared apart 76%  ·Fraternal twins reared together 55%  ·Biological siblings reared together 47% (studies show that reared apart about 24%)  ·Parents and children living together 40%  ·Parents and children living apart 31%  ·Adopted children living together 0% Nature v. Nurture 4  ·Unrelated people living apart 0% â€Å". Ridley, 1999, p. 83 [The number is a percentage correlation . Attach section from Ridley’s book There are many factors for both nature and nurture that contribute to the development of human behavior. It has been believed that family history, genotypes, and/or heritability as far as health is concerned (which can all be affected by genes) can predestine human behavior. A genotype can be defined as an individuals genetic inheritance and heritability can be defined as the extent to which variability in a characteristic within a group can be attributed to heredity. Genes have a direct connection to physical development. The question is how much of a influence do health problems, which are credited to nature, have on the development of human behavior? Additionally, physiological factors like neurotransmitters, brain structures, and hormones are influenced by genes. On the other hand do life experiences or environmental factors ultimately decide the outcome of human development? There are some theorists that believe environmental factors alone predestine human behavior. These theorists use the phenotype to support their claim. he phenotype can be defined as the overt expression of a individuals genetic inheritance, which may also show the influence of the environment. In fact, nurtures influences stem from factors such as: extended families and peer(s) experiences, parental, prenatal, socio-economic status, media, and marketing. So how much of an influence do environmental factors have on human behavior? A child is born with the potential abilit y to learn Chinese or Swahili, play a kazoo, climb a tree, make a strudel or a birdhouse, take pleasure in finding the coordinates of a star. Genetic inheritance determines a child’s abilities and weaknesses. But those who raise a child call forth from that matrix the traits and talents they consider important. (Buchwald, Emilie). Children missing their fathers tend to focus more on the medias preconception of the male role instead the being exposed the nurturing potential that the role may convey. (Gordon, 2004). To illustrate: Correlation of child-parent verbal ability scores. Nature v. Nurture 5 This graph shows correlations between children and their parents and adopted children and their biological and adoptive parents on verbal ability scores. Heritability intelligence It must be noted, however, that heritability is not pure genetic influence as the pre and postnatal environments must be taken into account. Heritability estimates based on comparing correlations between IQs of monozygotic (identical) twins reared together with IQs of dizygotic (fraternal) twins and siblings are likely to overestimate the genetic component because monozygotic twins share more similar environments both in the womb and out Nature v. Nurture 6  ·twins reared apart are not assigned at random to foster or adoptive parents since homes are selected purposely to with regard to characteristics of he child and characteristics of the family. This would partially account for the IQ correlations attributed to inheritance  ·twin studies may not be generalizable to the population at large as twins are more susceptible to prenatal trauma leading to retardation. The inclusion of retarded cases may increase the twin correlation in intelligence test scores. heritability indexes r efer to the population on which they were found at the time and is not applicable to an analysis of test performance between two population groups e. . ethnic groups.  ·heritability does not indicate the degree to which a trait can be modified e. g. even if the heritability of a trait, like intelligence were found to be 100% it wouldn’t mean it couldnt be modified. (Anastasi Urbina, 1997). After reviewing the pervious information common sense directs attention to the facts that indeed nature and nurture must co-exist and work together in the existence of human behavior. Because of these facts psychologists have begun to study behavioral genetics. Behavioral genetics can be defined as the study of the effects of heredity and life experiences on behavior. Nature alone cannot determine the outcome of human behavior and/or personality. Studies have proven that genetics alone do not determine or predestine health problems and that environmental factors play a role in the prevention or lack of prevention towards health problems or issues. And it is proven that nature exist because babies are born with the ability to express or communicate ( in their own way and language) that they want something or that something is wrong. This supports the theory, that Plato campaigned, there must be some amount of knowledge present at birth that provides proof of natures existence. In the same way, nurture alone cannot determine the outcome of human behavior. Environmental factors alone cannot sustain human behavior. It is a proven fact that not only environmental factors and/or life experiences contribute to the amount of knowledge gained in human behavior. Such as the baby from birth that is equipped with some amount knowledge, the baby must also so learn during its life span. Life experiences such as: trails and tribulations, parenting styles, living arrangements only work along with the nature factors provided. Nature, we are starting to realize, is every bit as important as nurture. Genetic influences, brain chemistry, and neurological development contribute strongly to who we are as children and what we become as adults. For example, Nature v. Nurture 7 tendencies to excessive worrying or timidity, leadership qualities, risk taking, obedience to authority, all appear to have a constitutional aspect. (Turecki, Stanley). In the same way, The theory, also called interactionism or dynamic developmentalism, suggests that traits are caused by a cascade of various factors, starting with DNA and going through various micro- and macroenvironmental signals or conditions that affect the final form of the trait. (Henderson, 2001, para. 1). For instance: Pendulum of opinion on Nature vs. Nurture through history The zeitgeist (the intellectual and culture flavor of a time and place) has swung back and forth over time with regard to the amount of influence that nature vs. nature has on human intelligence. Ridley (1999, p. 77) In conclusion, Genes and family may determine the foundation of the house, but time and place determine its form. (Kagan, Jerome). Nature and nurture must work together in the determination of human behavior. Thus, Science News (2003) reiterates that both nature and nurture play an equal role in the development of human behavior. To conclude, The route through childhood is shaped by many forces, and it differs for each of us. Our biological inheritance, the temperament with which we are born, the care we receive, our family Nature v. Nurture 8 elationships, the place where we grow up, the schools we attend, the culture in which we participate, and the historical period in which we live all these affect the paths we take through childhood and condition the remainder of our lives. (Wozniak, Robert H. ). Even though nature and nurture influence human behavior, nature and nurture work together equally in the development of human behavior because both genetics and environmental influences affect the outcome of a persons behavior and/or personality, while neither of the two traits can single- handedly determine ones behavior and/or personality.